Ends development with the congregation

From UUWiki
Revision as of 17:09, 16 October 2007 by Art (talk | contribs) (New page: '''Ends Development Process''' This is a process for congregational engagement in developing Ends statements. It is based on a process from World Café. "World Café Conversations are an ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ends Development Process

This is a process for congregational engagement in developing Ends statements. It is based on a process from World Café. "World Café Conversations are an intentional way to create a living network of conversation around questions that matter. A Café Conversation is a creative process for leading collaborative dialogue, sharing knowledge and creating possibilities for action in groups of all sizes."

Our thanks to Helen Foss, First Unitarian Church, Wilmington, Delaware for this outline.

Café Conversations Design

Welcome & Background Information - 10 minutes

Brief explanation of Policy Governance

Explanation of "Ends" and how draft ends were developed

What we want to accomplish today & why your input matters


Questions - 5 minutes


Table conversations to anchor connection to the church


Question 1. (Four minutes to write and six to share) - 10 minutes

What is it that you love about your church?


Question 2. (Staying at same table with time to reflect, then share) 10 minutes

What are the most important things that First Unitarian can do or be?


Reaction to Draft Ends Policies


Move to other tables for three rounds of table conversations


First round, focus on "mega" ends statement - 10 minutes

Second round, focus on Policies 1,2,3 (then move) - 20 minutes

Third round, focus on Policies 4,5,6 - 20 minutes


For each round of table conversation, first reflect on the following two questions: 1) Does the ends statement support you in allowing the church to touch your life? 2) How does this match your vision of what we can be? Then discuss your responses with your group, writing the following on chart paper: ? Strengths: List key aspects ? Concerns: Identify gaps. What is missing (Depending on the size of the group, these charts can be hung for sharing at the end.)


Debrief experience (possibly back in the original group, then together) - 15 minutes

What did you hear from others that surprised you?

What did you find in common?

Does what you have talked and thought about today lead you to engage in the church differently?


Closure - 10 minutes

Thank participants

Reiterate next steps (taking all feedback into consideration and process planned for refining Ends Draft)


A followup response

I use this process in my business all the time - have used it with groups of up to 2000. It has never failed me. It is important to have some music and to have flip chart paper for doodling. Four to a table works best if you can do it. I find the most powerful understandings come if you go back at least once - with the model suggested here I would go back at least twice to the "home table" so you can see what are common threads and interesting questions being asked. I also prefer - a preference thing for sure - to let the first conversation be very undirected - just explain policy governance, ends and let them talk about any reaction first - you get important and powerful stuff and people get to share any fears, resentments as well as hopes and dreams without too much structure. Then go to the more focused questions. Just my ideas - for what they are worth. But I agree it is a wonderful, energy giving, inclusive process.

Carol Houseman Houseman Consulting Web: www.housemanconsulting.com